The 16-35 has a wider zoom range VR and takes 77mm filters but is not as well built and does not match the optical quality of the 14-24. I sold it and bought a Tamron 15-30 hoping for an upgrade plus looking forward to the VR.
Nikon 16 35 Vs 14 24 - If you're looking for picture and video information related to the keyword you've come to pay a visit to the right site. Our site provides you with suggestions for seeing the maximum quality video and image content, search and locate more enlightening video articles and graphics that match your interests. includes one of thousands of video collections from various sources, particularly Youtube, therefore we recommend this video for you to view. It is also possible to contribute to supporting this site by sharing videos and images that you like on this site on your social networking accounts such as Facebook and Instagram or educate your closest friends share your experiences concerning the simplicity of access to downloads and the information you get on this website. This site is for them to visit this site.
Pin On Nikon Dreams
P3 20 p3 20 Nikon 14-24 vs Nikon 16-35 I had the Tokina 16-28 for a couple of years and thought it was good - but not great.
Nikon 16 35 vs 14 24. The 14-24 is a no-compromise wide angle lens the 17-35 is a purpose-built lens for pj use. 14mm is just so incredibly ultra-wide that it often simply wastes space around the edge of your images. 16-35mm f4G vs 18-35.
As a result the Sigma 14. While the Nikon 16-35mm f4G VR shows pretty impressive performance wide open it is no match to the 14-24mm f28G at equivalent apertures especially in the extreme corners. Both lenses have distortion with the 16-35 having most but easily corrected in post.
Better front-end cap 3. Due to a niche type of photograph I often create for some clients the closer the minimum focus distance the better for me. 16-35 VR and light for hiking.
Keith if you look at Payams link they are comparing your 14-24mm f28 against the new 16-35mm f4 and 17-35mm f28. In terms of the strong zone the 16-35. I thought that one of the highlights of the 14-24mm was that it is one of the most distotion free wideangles on the market.
Images taken with each lens are compared and contrasted. Your 14-24mm has very little distortion. And 24mm is just not really long enough to do anything other than the same style of wide angle compositions.
- Can use 77mm filters which you likely have already. Id read Ken Rockwells review claiming it to be even better than the 14-24 but in comparison found articles claiming it to be a lot softer. The 16-35 is optimized a bit for further shooting distances not so much the close stuff.
Nikon Lens Secrets to save you. See more comparisons. The 14-24 still is the sharpest wide-angle zoom ever mass-produced but if you need 26 mm fl it is the wrong lens.
Detailed comparison between the nikon 14-24mm f28 and the nikon 16-35mm f4. - Better between 20-24mm than the 14-24. However stopped down to f8 the 16-35mm produces very similar results with excellent sharpness throughout the.
The 16-35 is best in the dead middle of its focal length range peaking at 24mm where its better than the 14-24 at 24mm particularly at distance. - 25-35mm bonus range. Nor do I care about VR I use a tripod for all landscapes.
Id like to share my reasoning. - Has VR this is an unbelievably huge bonus - Lighter than the 14-24. Sharper at least in some reviews Contra.
In my experience to be honest the 14-24mm focal range is indeed slightly less useful than the 16-35mm focal range. It is a lot easier to crop to get the equivalent of 35 from a 24mm shot than it is to get to 14mm from 16mm especially when you cant physically back up any further. My partner is a Canon shooter with 40 years in the business and would almost switch platforms to be able to shoot with the 14-24.
14-24 pro et contra. P2 19 p2 19 Nikon 14-24 vs Nikon 16-35 I have both and love them each for different reasons. 16mm Both lenses will probably be used at f8 anyways so I dont care about the aperture difference.
14-24 Killer sharp even in corners for the most part. They are very different beasts for different usage. I went through this debate a while ago and here is the condensed version of the facts.
The Nikon 16-35 f4 Being a newer model and not having the f28 max aperture I felt like this could be a better alternative to the 17-35.
How To Choose A Lens For Night Sky Photography Night Sky Photography Sky Photography Night Skies
Sony Alpha Fe 16 35 F4 Z Oss Review By Sony Artisan Brian Matiash Sony Sony Camera Alpha Sony Alpha
The D3 And D3s Wearing The 14 24 And 16 35 Vr In 2021 Wide Angle Nikon Wide
Size Comparison Between The New Sigma 14 24mm F 2 8 Sony 16 35mm F 2 8 And Sony 12 24mm F 4 0 Lenses Sigma Sigmalens
Pin On Camera
Nikkor Z 24 70mm F 2 8 S Vs Nikkor 24 70mm F 2 8e Ed Vr Specifications Comparison Nikkor Z 24 70mm F 2 8 S Image Stabilization Dslr Photography Focal Length
The New Nikon Nikkor Z 14 30mm F 4 S And Nikkor Z 24 70mm F 2 8 S Mirrorless Lenses To Start Shipping On April 19th Nikon Rumors Nikon Lenses April 19
Pin On Art Instruction
Nikon Nikkor Af S 14 24 Mm F 2 8g Ed Review Introduction Lenstip Com Best Digital Camera Reflex Camera Shooting Camera
