17 40mm Vs 16 35mm

The 16-35s optical design incorporates new optical elements image stabilization and more. This is the closest distance that the lens can focus.

17 40mm Vs 16 35mm - If you're looking for picture and video information linked to the keyword you've come to pay a visit to the right site. Our site gives you suggestions for viewing the highest quality video and image content, hunt and locate more enlightening video content and images that fit your interests. includes one of thousands of video collections from several sources, particularly Youtube, so we recommend this movie that you view. It is also possible to bring about supporting this website by sharing videos and graphics that you enjoy on this site on your social networking accounts such as Facebook and Instagram or tell your closest friends share your experiences concerning the ease of access to downloads and the information you get on this website. This site is for them to visit this website.

Pin On My Photography Gear

The 16-35mm f4L IS USM is FULLY weather sealed while the 17-40mm requires a front filter to help complete the sealing.

17 40mm vs 16 35mm. I own the lens and like it a lot for these purposes. Many will appreciate the 16-35 f4L ISs benefits for the difference in price. At some focal lengths and apertures such as widest focal length and aperture the 16-35mm f28 is the weaker the 17-40mm is in the middle and the newer 16-35mm f4 is the strongest.

A shorter minimum focus distance allows you to get closer to your subject and is particularly important when doing macro photography. The roof looks warmer on the 16-35. 17-40 could be eeking out some better contrast or that could just be the slight cooler temperature to the shot.

A longer maximum focal length allows you to focus in on a small part of a scene and offers a narrower angle of view than shorter focal lengths. Reasons to choose Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM over Canon EF 17-40mm f40L USM. Tamron 17-35mm f28-4 Di OSD.

The 17-40mm lens is 063 inches shorter and weighs about 03 lbs less than the 16-35mm lens. As far as color and image is concerned 17-40 looks to be a bit cooler or 16-35 bit warmer. Just changing the white balance.

The primary reason is price. If you demand the best and dont mind the size weight and expense the Canon 16-35mm f28 L II 2007-today is the best that Canons ever made. But does all of this actually translate into significantly better performance over the Canon 17-40 F4 in the.

LensHero compares the Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM vs the Canon EF 16-35mm f28L II USM to find out which is the winner. When it comes to corner sharpness the Canon 16-35 F4 IS is a clear winner with the 17-40 performing softer on corners. Another selling point for the 17-40mm for me was that at apertures of f11 and up the image quality is said to be equal to that of the 16-35mm it is when the 17-40mm lens is shot at wide open that the 16-35mm is the far winner in image sharpness and contrast as you would hope and expect seeing you dropped the extra cash for the f28 lens.

Aperture diameter length and weight Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM vs EF 16-35mm f28L II USM - Our Analysis. With regards to corner CA the 16-35 F4 is again the clear winner. HttpswwwanigotahrSupport my channel over Patreon PayPal or Amazon affiliate linksPatreon.

The Canon 17-40mm f4 L is unbeaten optically and the lightest of the zooms sold today. Half of the center sharpness images resolve sharper on the 17-40 irregardless of focal length and F-number. However rebate can affect the price comparison significantly.

Canon EF 16-35mm f28L II USM. Has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 17-40mm f40L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f28L USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses and decide which one to choose.

16-35mm f28 L II 2007-today. At other focal lengths and apertures they are much less different. I am not so particular about the extra stop you get with the 16-35 as I shoot mostly landscapes.

Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM. The 17-40 is a fine lens for small-aperture tripod-based photography of subjects such as landscape architecture or similar on full frame cameras where its stopped down performance can be very good. Neither the 17-40 nor the 16-35 are your best choices on your 60D cropped-sensor camera.

The 16-35mm f4L IS USM lens has 16 elements in 12 groups while the 17-40mm lens only has 12 elements in 9 groups. Weather-sealed splashproof Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM. The 17-40mm is a very nice lens but I miss that extra millimetre on the wide end compared with the 10-22mm.

Focal Length - Wide. The Canon 16-35 F4 IS is Canons newest Ultra-Wide Angle Zoom with F4 Image Stabilization and like the 17-40 has an all-internal focusing design. With the current instant rebates in place the 17-40mm f4L is only 25000 less expensive than its 16-35 f4L IS counterpart.

In architecture shots the 17-40mm works well wtih a bright enough viewfinder on the 5D to be quite comfortable to use. Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM on Canon EOS 5DS R vs Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM on Canon EOS 5DS R vs Sony FE Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS on Sony A7R II COMPARISON SELECTION 3 selected items max VIEW.